New AI smart glasses controlled by ‘brain signals’ have been unveiled by Meta.

A ‘Neural Band’ can detect electrical impulses in the forearm, allowing tiny hand gestures to control the built-in screen on the lens.

Users will be able to see AI generated images and video with the glasses, called Meta Ray-Ban Display, and make use of a camera, speakers and microphone.

The new technology is one step towards CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s goal of achieving ‘personal superintelligence’.

The new Ray-Ban Display will project a phone-like interface on the right lens, allowing users to see texts, photos and make live phone calls.

But whatever you’re looking at won’t be visible from the outside.

An LED light on the frame will alert others when the camera on the glasses is active.

Other things the technology will be able to do include provide captions and translations for live conversations and give walking directions.

However these glasses will replace the keyboard and mouse with signals from the brain.

In what Zuckerberg labelled a ‘huge scientific breakthrough’, little muscle movements will be picked up by the company’s Neural Band to control the glasses.

The water-resistant bracelet will detect tiny movements such as pinches, swipes and taps.

The glasses use electromyography (EMG) to register signals sent between your brain and your hand when performing a gesture.

Handwriting will also be possible later this year.

AI will also play a big role in the new product, with Meta’s AI chatbot able to answer questions and show pictures through the Ray-Ban Display.

The new wearable devices will be priced at $799 (£585) and be available from September 30 in the US.

They’ll hit stores in the UK, France, Italy and Canada in early 2026.

They are not the only new piece of tech announced by Meta.

The trillion-dollar company also unveiled a set of Oakly smart glasses designed for sport.

The 66g-heavy Oakley Meta Vanguard will offer a camera, nose piece, speakers and AI tech to be used while exercising.

Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.

For more stories like this, check our news page.

There were more than 16,000 excess deaths in Europe due to heatwaves driven by climate change this summer, researchers have concluded.

Looking at the impact of a warming world on excess mortality, they said of these deaths, 1,147 were in the UK.

The study released today looked at cities across the continent during the roasting hot summer, the warmest on record, which saw temperatures of 46C in Spain and Portugal.

Overall, the researchers estimated 2025 was 1.3°C hotter than it would have been without man-made climate change, but that the effect was more pronounced in the summer months: August was an estimated 2.3°C hotter, for example.

Jim Dale, a meteorologist who wrote ‘Surviving Extreme Weather: The Complete Climate Change Preparedness Manual’, told Metro: ‘Am I surprised that people die with extreme heat? Absolutely not: it’s written on the can.’

He said that 35°C was usually the threshold at which there started to be major health concerns, but it could be lower.

The study led by researchers at Imperial College London used modelling, historical mortality records and peer-reviewed methods to provide early estimates of fatalities this summer.

Authors warned that their analysis was only a snapshot of the death toll, as the areas they studied represented only around 30% of Europe’s population.

Extreme heat is known as a ‘silent killer’ because the majority of heat-related deaths also go unreported, while official government figures can take months to appear.

People often die from conditions such as heart, respiratory, or kidney problems that are made worse by high temperatures, even though heat is rarely recorded on death certificates.

2025 saw the UK’s hottest summer overall on record, so far. But Mr Dale told Metro that this year’s heatwaves were not a blip, but part of a trend seen around the world.

Pointing to the record-breaking heat in 2022, where the hottest single day was recorded in the UK with 40°3C, Mr Dale said: ‘There was a much longer fuse this time around (in 2025). We had the dry spring; it wasn’t particularly hot, but sunny as well. Then we got the summer which was periodically hot, particularly in the south.’

Hitting out at people who downplayed the impact of climate change, he said those walking around bare chested in the heat were not those most at risk: ‘It does affect the elderly, the infirm, and those with underlying conditions.’

The study found that people aged 65 and over made up 85% of the excess deaths, and those over 85 make up 41%.

Heat deaths reported across the continent included a 51-year-old street cleaner in Barcelona, Spain, and a 47-year-old construction worker in San Lazzaro di Savena, Italy.

Clair Barnes, researcher at the Centre for Environmental Policy at Imperial College London, said: ‘It may not sound like much, but our study shows that shifts in summer heat of just a few degrees can be the difference between life and death for thousands of people.

‘The longer it takes governments to shift away from fossil fuels and cut emissions, the deadlier summer heat will become – even with efforts to become more resilient to extreme temperatures.’

Researchers noted that other factors play a role in how deadly heat is, such as preparedness, population demographics and air pollution.

They called for governments to build resilience to extreme heat, such as ensuring cities have ‘green and blue spaces’, meaning grassy or watery areas like parks and pools, increasing air conditioning, and allowing for flexible work schedules during hot periods.

The analysis was conducted by 11 researchers from Imperial College London, the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, the University of Bern, the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute and the University of Copenhagen.

Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.

For more stories like this, check our news page.

If you heard a new song on a streaming platform, would you realise if it was AI generated? Would you care?

This is a question we’re going to have to think about more, with a surge in tracks generated by algorithms.

French streaming platform Deezer has released new figures showing that over a quarter of tracks delivered to them every day are now fully AI generated.

Now at 28%, this is a big jump even from the beginning of this year, when the figure was only 10% in January, rising to 18% in April.

Deezer, which launched in 2007 and is a rival platform to Spotify, said it is now being inundated with 30,000 fully AI-generated tracks every day.

This is not just bad for listeners, who may think they’re supporting real bands only to be listening to a batch of coding.

It can also be downright criminal: Deezer previously explained to Metro that many AI tracks are uploaded for fraudulent purposes.

So-called streaming farms allow for tracks to be listened to over and over again by bots to game the system, and earn royalties.

It would be too obvious if an unknown artist suddenly racked up millions of streams, so fraudsters flood streaming platforms with lots of fake songs which are each streamed just a few thousands times: enough to make money, but less likely to make people suspicious.

Aurelien Herault, Chief Innovation Officer, told Metro: ‘If an artist is able to gain a significant number of users streaming their music, they then become entitled to a bigger share of the royalty pool.

‘This is true whether an artist is using AI or not; the only difference being that AI music is significantly easier to produce.’

Deezer prides itself on being the only streaming platform to tag if a track is generated by AI, giving transparency to listeners.

The need for this was illustrated after a mysterious ‘band’ called The Velvet Sundown racked up millions of streams on Spotify.

When they first became popular, there was nothing to indicate the band was ‘synthetic’ aside from their lack of social media presence, and some oddly smooth media images.

To identify and catalogue music that was made by computers, Deezer uses a detection tool which looks for hallmarks of AI music, made by programmes like Suno and Udio.

Alexis Lanternier, CEO, said: ‘Following a massive increase during the year, AI music now makes up a significant part of the daily track delivery to music streaming and we want to lead the way in minimizing any negative impact for artists and fans alike.

‘Our approach is simple: we remove fully AI-generated content from algorithmic recommendations and we don’t include it in editorial playlists.

‘This way we ensure the impact on the royalty pool remains minimal, while providing a transparent user experience. And most importantly, we continue to fight fraudulent activity, which is the main driver behind uploading fully AI generated content.’

A study last year by CISAC and PMP Strategy found that nearly 25% of creators’ revenues are at risk by 2028, which could amount to as much as €4 billion by that time.

The report warned that even if listeners aren’t seeking out the tracks directly, AI music could become the go to for background music such as used in public places, or on social media.

Meanwhile, it could be used to cut costs for licensing music in lower budget films, series or games.

Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.

For more stories like this, check our news page.

For millennials growing up in the blossoming internet era, LimeWire was an essential part of life.

They wouldn’t want to be caught dead on the school bus without the latest Beyoncé, Eminem or Linkin Park track on their mp3 player or iPod nano.

That’s where filesharing sites like LimeWire came in – a site notorious for sharing pirated music.

Sure, your download might include a snippet of a radio DJ introducing a track, or release a virus onto the family desktop computer, but it was all worth it, right?

LimeWire was shut down in 2010 by a judge and in 2011 its founder ended up paying the record industry $105million in damages.

But the brand was resurrected as a crypto and file sharing company in 2022, and it has just made a major acquisition – the infamous Fyre Festival.

Both LimeWire and Fyre Festival are well known names in the music world for different reasons.

LimeWire was known for enabling rampant piracy, costing the music industry huge amounts of money, while Fyre Festival promised a luxury music festival but was cancelled after a series of problems related to security, food, and artist relations.

The rights for Fyre Festival were put up for auction on eBay in July, and LimeWire bought it with a successful bid of $245,300.

Julian Zehetmayr, CEO of LimeWire, said: ‘Fyre became a symbol of hype gone wrong, but it also made history.

‘We’re not bringing the festival back – we’re bringing the brand and the meme back to life. This time with real experiences, and without the cheese sandwiches.’

Marcus Feistl, LimeWire’s COO, added: ‘We’re not here to repeat the mistakes – we’re here to own the meme and do it right.

‘Fyre became a symbol of everything that can go wrong. Now it’s our chance to show what happens when you pair cultural relevance with real execution.’

LimeWire described Fyre Festival’s revival as ‘bold, self-aware, and impossible to ignore – staying true to its chaotic legacy, but with a new layer of credibility, creativity, and control’.

They also said it will ‘expand beyond the digital realm’, which could signal a third attempt at hosting an in-person festival after the first two failed spectacularly.

LimeWire won the bidding war on eBay against a number of other interested parties, including creative agency Maximum Effort which was co-founded by actor Ryan Reynolds.

He said: ‘Congrats to LimeWire for their winning bid for Fyre Fest. I look forward to attending their first event but will be bringing my own palette of water.’

Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.

For more stories like this, check our news page.

October 2018. Lady Gaga, Calvin Harris and Nicki Minaj were in the charts, Theresa May was prime minister, and Apple’s iPhone XR was about to debut.

It doesn’t feel that long ago, but prepare for time to hit like a rogue wave… that iPhone will become nearly obsolete this week.

You may have sent all your millennial gifs in capital letters on it, swiped your way through Tinder with it, or perhaps you still use it today.

But it can’t download the latest software update now Apple has released iOS 26, just before the newly released iPhone 17 and iPhone Air hit shelves.

That means that, while you can still use it and get critical security patches (for now), it won’t get the latest features, and app developers will gradually stop catering to it.

So it will slowly phase out of your life, until you trade it in for, I don’t know, a brick, or a different model that folds up like a creaseless piece of paper.

To put it in perspective, the iPhone XR was the bestselling phone of 2019. That’s only six years ago, so there are no doubt lots of them in our pockets still.

A dangerous amount of waste

This is why there are now warnings about mounds of e-waste that could be generated as people feel pressured to upgrade.

Over 150 million units of the XR series had been sold by 2020, and a waste company has now estimated that there could still be over 75 million of them still active, given that roughly 50% of iPhones survive to six years.

Business Waste, a broker firm for disposing of commercial waste, has estimated the value of e-waste that could be generated if everyone who still has an XR decides to get rid.

They estimated that the materials in them, such as copper, silver, gold, and palladium, could be worth £271,425,584 in total.

In total, the weight of these metals alone would be 1,238,944 kg, roughly the same as 103 double-decker buses. 

Apple offers a trade-in service, and there are also specialist recycling services for electronics, but as a species, we still dump a lot of e-waste in the bin.

This is bad, not only because valuable metals are lost to recycling (so more have to be dug up), but because the phones contain materials that can be harmful, such as heavy metals, which can leach into soil and groundwater, contaminating them.

Meanwhile, their lithium-ion batteries can catch fire or explode.

So if you are saying goodbye to a phone in the coming months, do it properly. You might even get some money for it.

A version of this article was first published on September 2, 2025.

Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.

For more stories like this, check our news page.

Drops, Clozemaster, Busuu, Rosetta Stone… I’ve tried dozens of language apps, and spent hundreds of pounds trying to learn another language.

I’ve got lifetime access to Babbel, and climbed the Duolingo leagues obsessively, ping-ponging between first and second on Diamond with my scoreboard nemesis (you’ll never take the top spot, SaltedFish!)

But now it could be time to delete my folder of apps and just stick to good old Google Translate. 

At the end of August, Google released a beta feature called Practice, allowing users to have realtime conversations and practice their listening skills.

When I heard about it, I had the kind of excitement you more commonly see for new trainers launches, or Oasis tickets. 

Although artificial intelligence has promised to redefine language learning for years, it’s never yet hooked me.

Yes, you can just chat in another language with ChatGPT. And if you just want to have a natural conversation, it’s probably your best bet.

Its advanced voice mode lets you just open a conversation and chat back and forth, without constantly pressing play and record. And it understands my broken attempts at speaking very well, even if my pronounciation is off, something Google’s Gemini chatbot failed at when I tried the same (it constantly thought I was talking about nonsense such as ‘October slow urine’).

But this is very freeform; I like that Google Translate’s gamified offering teaches words on a theme first, giving simple tasks to complete, and collating all the words I learn.

Duolingo has also invested heavily in AI, with a roleplay option for premium users, but I said goodbye to that guilt-tripping owl after ‘completing’ my chosen language, and am not ready to have him resurrected. I get why some prefer its cutesy lessons-style format, but why would I pay, if I can access similar features for free on apps I already use all the time?

I’m sure there will soon be an explosion of opportunities for AI in language learning, to the point we just download Japanese to our brain chip or whatever. You can already get live translation in your headphones, for example.

But so far, Google’s new feature is what I’ve been waiting for as a language learner. 

You can create your own scenarios or pick one from a list, setting your own difficulty level, earning three hearts a day for doing enough exercises.

A language app if you’re not richer than the King

Most enticingly, it is free, at least for now.

Given that most language apps want you to pay £8 a month, £60 a year, or even more, this is a big draw.

A year or so ago I downloaded AI language app Jumpspeak that lets users have real-time conversations, but found it really disappointing.

Not only was it extortionately priced (it’s still £79.99 per year), but the chats were so stilted, I felt the app was trying to subtly tell me to go away. I didn’t keep using it after my free trial ended.

The app does seem to have improved since then, but it still mishears many words I’m pretty sure I pronounced coherently.

Google’s beta Practice feature, currently available on its iOS and Android apps, feels like something I’ll use without getting constantly frustrated. Presumably, Gemini (which powers it) can comprehend things better in these limited scenarios, though it does still mishear things. I would like the option to see my words appear as I speak them, so I can flag if it has heard incorrectly.

At the moment, Practice only supports French and Spanish for English speakers, but with the app allowing translation for 243 languages, there’s massive scope for it to expand.

There’s another new feature too

As well as the speaking opportunity, Google now makes it easier to translate a conversation in real time, without constantly having to change the language settings.

Good for me, given that with relatives who don’t speak English, I use the app almost every day.

While it’s exciting for a language learner, people teaching languages may be more apprehensive about where this is all going. 

Despite being a dedicated app user, none of them beat in person interactions with a human teacher, where you can talk about culture and build a relationship, as well as just learn a load of words.

That’s a very different type of experience to a language app, which can be used in a more bitesize way, on your commute or while waiting for pasta to cook.

There are obvious limitations to Google’s new language learning feature: it’s designed for speaking and listening practice, rather than teaching you the basics in the first place. In its current form, it might get repetitive after a while.

For an overall course teaching grammar too with traditional modules, my favourite app is still Babbel, although I’ve run out of road there with the language I most want to learn, as it only goes to A2 level. 

While how much artificial intelligence is really going to take over our lives is debateable, with language learning it’s a no brainer.

You have a conversation partner who is always in the same time zone, and doesn’t charge you £25 an hour.

Just don’t give up on people completely. They’re why you want to learn the language in the first place, after all. 

Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.

For more stories like this, check our news page.

Spotify has announced it will be rolling out CD-quality audio for all Premium users who switch it on.

‘Hallelujah!’ you might say, if you have good enough speakers or WiFi headphones.

Even the company itself admits this has been a long time coming, describing lossless audio as ‘one of the most anticipated features’ – which is another way of saying they first claimed it was coming ‘later this year’ in 2021.

It means that if you’ve stayed loyal to Spotify all that time since music streamers first hit the mainstream, you’ll finally be rewarded, and won’t need to migrate all your playlists.

The feature is rolling out now and next month, and users in the UK, US and Australia are already starting to get access.

It’s still in process though, so don’t worry if you can’t see it yet (we couldn’t).

Although Spotify, which launched in 2008, pioneered music streaming, in later years some users have become frustrated with a lack of good sound quality.

Apple Music, Tidal, Deezer, Amazon Music, and Qobuz all offer lossless audio (actually, Apple has done for four years), so some Spotify users had been questioning if they should jump ship.

The addition of direct messaging in the app last month had even annoyed some as an unwanted distraction when lossless still wasn’t available.

Gustav Gyllenhammar, VP of Subscriptions, said: ‘The wait is finally over; we’re so excited lossless sound is rolling out to Premium subscribers.

‘We’ve taken time to build this feature in a way that prioritizes quality, ease of use, and clarity at every step, so you always know what’s happening under the hood. With Lossless, our premium users will now have an even better listening experience.’

If you have a maestro’s ears and top-of-the-range speakers to stream your AI playlists, you might still be disappointed, however.

Spotify will let users stream ‘almost every’ track in up to 24-bit/44.1 kHz FLAC, which is slightly better than that offered by CDs, but it’s still not as high as Apple Music, Tidal, and Qobuz, which support up to 24-bit / 192 kHz. 

How to enable lossless audio on Spotify?

You should get a notification when the new feature is available to you. Make sure you keep the app updated.

1. Tap your profile icon in the top left.
2. Go to Settings & Privacy → Media Quality.
3. Select where you want to enable lossless audio: Wi-Fi, cellular, downloads.

You’ll know it’s on because the Lossless indicator will appear in the Now Playing view or bar.

It’s best to stream on Wi-FI, as Bluetooth does not currently provide enough bandwidth to transmit lossless audio, so the signal has to be compressed.

Lossless should be rolling out to all Premium subscribers, without the need for them to pay extra.

Bear in mind that it will use significantly more data, so if you don’t have an unlimited plan, you may want to be careful with it.

Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.

For more stories like this, check our news page.